“I remember where I was . . . I remember who I was with.“

(posted on Escape from Averageness®, every year, on the anniversary of 9/11)

September 11, 2001.  8:46 AM.  Nineteen years ago today, I was in the offices of Fidelity Homes, in Venice, Florida, commencing a process mapping engagement to give this start-up homebuilding company a state-of-the-art set of business processes.  SAI Consulting’s involvement was part of a large, pro bono effort, called “From the Ground Up”, arranged by Professional Builder, that included a number of top consultants serving the homebuilding industry.

My role was to be the Process Architect for Fidelity Homes.

Sitting across the table were David Hunihan and Todd Menke, two then-young builders, eager to take their experience in homebuilding and pursue a National Housing Quality award.  We were well underway, when David was pulled away by a telephone call.  It was his wife, Lauren, asking if he was aware of what was going on in New York City.

As the events continued to unfold, in New York City, in Washington DC, in western Pennsylvania, we finally decided that it was impossible to focus on mapping workflow, and, anyway, under the circumstances, whatever we were doing did not seem all that important.  We cancelled everything for the rest of the day, and, in our own ways, watched and tried to process what was happening.

The late Bill Lurz, then a senior editor at Professional Builder, joined us the following day.  We finished the project two days later, and I drove back to my family in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida through a tropical storm.  On that day, the welcome home had extra meaning.

The article for “From the Ground Up’ was written and published in Professional Builder.  I told the full story of Fidelity Homes in a six-part series on Escape from Averageness® in 2011, coinciding with the tenth anniversary of the 9/11 attack.

I still consider the events of 9/11 to be a matter of unfinished business for this country.  Yes, it is difficult to resolve unfinished business when the risk associated with that business is ever changing.  Osama bin Laden is dead, Al-Qaeda is a remnant, ISIS has been destroyed, but the intentions they fomented remain.  The threat of terrorism has not ended;  it is alive on four or more continents.

Domestically, is Antifa, at its heart, really any different?

Time has only increased my feelings about it.  We were attacked, almost twenty years ago, because of who we were, because of who we unapologetically remain.  Our enemies see it as unfinished business, as well.

Evil is the enemy of good;  that evil has an ever-more-radical face, both secular and non-secular.  In the presence of that evil, we have failed to clearly state what war is.  We have dismissed the understanding of war as the complete and utter destruction of an enemy.  Whether the outcome of complete and utter destruction of an enemy can be accomplished by cutting off its head, or has to be achieved through the complete annihilation of its being, doesn’t matter.

It doesn’t matter what we think of issues like American Exceptionalism, our place in the world, the tradeoff between national security and the constitutional rights to privacy of US citizens, the threat of terrorist attacks on our own soil, the still unaddressed murder of US diplomats and security personnel in Benghazi, the ramifications of decisions not to intervene in Iran and Syria, the continuing involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq, the ebb and flow of ISIS, Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and all of the other bad actors, the question of what happens if Iran or North Korea become terrorist regimes with nuclear weapons, cyber warfare, the more likely employment of infectious diseases as a weapon.

The discussions on all of those matters miss the point.

The discussions miss the point, because they don’t address the root cause of the problem.  The core problem is not the threat of future terrorist attacks or rogue regime nuclear attacks, or any of the rest.  The problem is the terrorists and their sponsors;   the problem is rogue nuclear regimes and their enablers;  the problem is countries that have always been our enemies and will never be our friends.

And, the solution is not attrition, or containment, or control, or minimization, or dismantlement of the threat, or mounting an international coalition against terror, or imposing sanctions, or providing more humanitarian aid, or granting political asylum, or creating deeper understanding, becoming woke, or negotiating peace, or peace, itself.

It is true that, as Christians, we are told to love our enemies.  It is also true that love and forgiveness do not remove consequences, and that scripture is filled with instances when the children of God were instructed to destroy their enemies.  And – yes – at some point, the One, True God, in His righteousness and omnipotence, may decide to impart His own justice to this situation.

However – absent divine intervention – we cannot afford the “problem of conjecture”, as Henry Kissinger described it.  We have now assured ourselves that there will be a war;  if not a nuclear war, then certainly a war over who will have nuclear weapons.  Competitors that already have nuclear weapons no longer fear us;  the ones that hope to obtain them will not fear us, either.  We are now in a far more dangerous, more deadly, more vulnerable situation than we were in the aftermath of 9/11.

“Fleury.  Tell me what you whispered to Janet, in the briefing, to get her to stop crying about Fran, you know, before all this, before we even got airborne.  What’d you say to her?  You remember?”

“I told her we were gonna kill ’em all.”

(The Kingdom, Universal Pictures, 2007)